Why the study?
The study was designed to evaluate the potential utility of optical coherence tomography angiography perfusion density measurements to discriminate patients with arterial hypertension by cardiovascular risk category.
Does optical coherence tomography angiography detect differences in macular and peripapillary perfusion density among patients with varying cardiovascular risk due to arterial hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=73)
Does optical coherence tomography angiography detect differences in macular and peripapillary perfusion density among patients with varying cardiovascular risk due to arterial hypertension?
p-value: p=⩽ 0.047
Optical coherence tomography angiography can detect decreased macular perfusion density in hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk, suggesting its potential as a supportive imaging tool for risk stratification.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential utility of perfusion density measurements to discriminate patients with arterial hypertension by cardiovascular risk category. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, one eye per subject was evaluated (N = 73). The study cohort was divided into three groups according to the clinical criteria established by the European Guidelines for Arterial Hypertension: 26 controls, 24 patients with low cardiovascular risk, and 23 patients with very high cardiovascular risk. All patients were examined using RS-3000 Advance optical coherence tomography angiography to analyze macular and peripapillary perfusion density. RESULTS: There were no differences among the three risk groups by sex or age. Decreased macular perfusion density was found at the level of the superficial and deep plexuses (p ⩽ 0.047). No differences were observed in peripapillary perfusion density (p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: Optical coherence tomography angiography can detect changes in macular perfusion density in patients with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk and might represent a supportive imaging method in the evaluation of the cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pascual-Prieto et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Arterial hypertension (n=73). Arterial hypertension and cardiovascular risk category vs. Controls was evaluated on Macular and peripapillary perfusion density (p=⩽ 0.047).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: