Key result
Live and independent post-tournament spotters showed moderate agreement for identifying incidents with at least one 'red flag' for possible concussion (Kappa 0.58; 95% CI 0.41-0.76).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to report the frequency of head impacts and visible signs of possible concussion, along with their inter-rater reliability, at the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022.
What is the frequency and inter-rater reliability of visible signs of possible concussion observed during the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022™?
Observational
What is the frequency and inter-rater reliability of visible signs of possible concussion observed during the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022™?
Effect estimate: Kappa 0.58 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.76)
Visible signs of concussion categorized as 'red flags' were infrequent with uncertain reliability, while common signs like 'clutching of the head' and 'slow to get up' occurred too frequently to be reliable indicators of possible concussion in football.
May enhance sideline concussion screening in elite soccer; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: To report the frequency of head impacts and associated visible signs of possible concussion, and their inter-rater reliability at the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022™. DESIGN: Observational and inter-rater reliability study. METHODS: Fifteen visible signs of potential sport-related concussion, grouped into "red flags", "yellow flags", and "other signs", were recorded live by FIFA injury spotters during the tournament. Post-tournament all matches were reviewed for visible signs by independent injury spotters. Agreement was assessed using Fleiss kappa (κ) and Prevalence And Bias Adjusted Kappa. RESULTS: FIFA spotters registered 172 head impacts live, while the post-tournament independent spotters registered 206 (67 % positive agreement). Both groups observed five incidents with at least one "red flag", though these were not identical, resulting in moderate agreement (Kappa (K) = 0.58, 0.41 to 0.76). Agreement for each "red flag" varied from poor to almost perfect (K = -0.01 to 1.00). Incidents with "yellow flags" showed poor agreement (K = -0.46, -0.64 to -0.29), primarily due to differences in scoring "slow to get up", while signs "face or scalp injury" and "lying motionless" had moderate to substantial agreement (K = 0.58 to 0.66). Inter-rater reliability of each visible sign varied from poor to substantial (K = -0.01 to 0.75), with low prevalence of some signs directly influencing kappa values. For the majority of visible signs, results of the prevalence-adjusted-and-bias-adjusted kappa showed almost perfect (K = 0.81 to 1.00) agreement and inter-rater reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Visible signs of concussion categorized as "red flags" were infrequent, resulting in uncertain reliability. The frequency and reliability of visible signs categorized as "yellow flags" and "other signs" varied, with the visible signs "clutching of the head" and "slow to get up" occurring so frequently that their utility for identifying possible concussion in football is questionable. Further research should focus on investigating specificity of the visible signs in larger studies with surveillance and clinical follow-up from multiple competitions (seasons).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serner et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Possible concussion. Live observation by FIFA injury spotters vs. Post-tournament independent review was evaluated on Agreement on incidents with at least one 'red flag' (Kappa 0.58, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.76). Live and independent post-tournament spotters showed moderate agreement for identifying incidents with at least one 'red flag' for possible concussion (Kappa 0.58; 95% CI 0.41-0.76).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: