Key result
Hemodynamic and metabolic optimization protocols, such as goal-directed fluid therapy, were associated with reductions in 30-day mortality (15.5% vs. 21.8%) and complications, although outcomes varied across studies.
Why the study?
Patients with critical comorbidities undergoing major abdominal surgery face high complication risks, and the effectiveness of hemodynamic and metabolic optimization protocols required systematic evaluation.
Do perioperative hemodynamic and metabolic optimization strategies improve outcomes in adult patients with critical comorbidities undergoing major abdominal surgery?
Systematic Review
Do perioperative hemodynamic and metabolic optimization strategies improve outcomes in adult patients with critical comorbidities undergoing major abdominal surgery?
Hemodynamic and metabolic optimization may improve outcomes such as mortality and complications in high-risk abdominal surgery, though effects vary across studies.
May support multimodal optimization protocols in high-risk abdominal surgery; leaves open optimal component selection and effect magnitude.
Introduction: patients with critical comorbidities undergoing major abdominal surgery face elevated risks of complications due to reduced physiological reserve. Hemodynamic and metabolic optimization strategies, including goal-directed fluid therapy and glycemic or nutritional protocols, may improve perioperative outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of such interventions in high-risk patients.Methodology: a systematic search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library up to May 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and cohort observational studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool for RCTs and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data.Results: seventeen studies evaluated hemodynamic and metabolic optimization in high-risk abdominal surgery. Hemodynamic strategies—such as goal-directed fluid therapy guided by cardiac index or stroke volume variation—were associated with reductions in 30-day mortality (15.5% vs. 21.8%, p=0.005), complications, ICU admissions, and length of stay in several trials. However, outcomes were inconsistent across studies, with some showing no significant benefits. Metabolic optimization, including glycemic control and individualized nutrition, improved nitrogen balance, body composition, glycemic targets, and reduced liver dysfunction. Malnutrition was linked to increased complications and prolonged hospital stay. While many interventions showed promising results, variability in study designs and outcomes limits definitive conclusions.Conclusion: hemodynamic and metabolic optimization may improve outcomes in high-risk abdominal surgery, though effects vary. Multimodal strategies targeting fluid balance, glycemic control, and nutrition appear beneficial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tapia et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in High-risk major abdominal surgery. Hemodynamic and metabolic optimization protocols vs. Standard care was evaluated on 30-day mortality (highlighted example from included trials) (p=0.005). Hemodynamic and metabolic optimization protocols, such as goal-directed fluid therapy, were associated with reductions in 30-day mortality (15.5% vs. 21.8%) and complications, although outcomes varied across studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: