Why the study?
Does SM-19712 prevent ischemia/reperfusion-induced renal dysfunction and tissue damage in rats with ischemic acute renal failure?
Does SM-19712 prevent ischemia/reperfusion-induced renal dysfunction and tissue damage in rats with ischemic acute renal failure?
The novel ECE inhibitor SM-19712 protects against ischemia/reperfusion-induced acute renal failure in rats, highlighting the pathogenic role of endothelin-1 in ischemic renal injury.
Highlights endothelin-1's role in ischemic renal injury; leaves open whether ECE inhibition benefits human acute kidney injury.
Effects of SM-19712 (4-chloro-N-[[(4-cyano-3-methyl- 1-1-phenyl- 1H-pyrazol-5-yl)amino]carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide, monosodium salt), a novel endothelin converting enzyme (ECE) inhibitor, on ischemic acute renal failure (ARF) in rats were examined in comparison with those of phosphoramidon, a conventional ECE inhibitor. ARF was induced by occlusion of the left renal artery and vein for 45 min followed by reperfusion, 2 weeks after contralateral nephrectomy. Renal function in ARF rats markedly decreased at 24 h after reperfusion. Intravenous bolus injection of SM-19712 (3, 10, 30 mg/kg) prior to the occlusion attenuated dose-dependently the ischemia/reperfusion-induced renal dysfunction. Histopathological examination of the kidney of ARF rats revealed severe renal damages such as tubular necrosis, proteinaceous casts in tubuli and medullary congestion, all of which were dose-dependently attenuated by SM-19712. Protective effects of phosphoramidon (10 mg/kg) on ARF-induced functional and tissue damages were less potent than that of the same dose of SM-19712. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) content in the kidney after the ischemia/reperfusion was significantly increased, being the maximum level at 6 h after reperfusion, and this elevation was completely suppressed by the higher dose of SM-19712. Our findings support the view that renal ET-1 plays an important role in the development of ischemia/reperfusion-induced renal injury. SM-19712 may be useful in the treatment of ischemic ARF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumura et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: