Key result
Novel circulating biomarkers in pulmonary arterial hypertension may provide deeper pathophysiological understanding, support clinical decision-making, and enable precision medicine.
Why the study?
Pulmonary arterial hypertension is associated with diagnostic delay and poor outcomes, prompting intense inquiry into novel circulating biomarkers beyond natriuretic peptides to improve pathophysiological understanding, decision-making, and individual phenotyping.
This state-of-the-art review discusses recent advances in circulating biomarkers for pulmonary arterial hypertension, emphasizing their potential to support clinical decision-making and precision medicine.
Biomarker advances in PAH remain exploratory; leaves open integration into clinical decision-making or precision medicine pending prospective validation.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a complex and heterogeneous condition, associated with a considerable diagnostic delay, diminished exercise capacity, and poor outcomes. In pulmonary arterial hypertension, biomarker research has become a subject of intense inquiry, and novel circulating biomarkers acknowledged in a multitude of mechanistic pathways are emerging. Beyond the widely used natriuretic peptides, novel biomarkers may provide deeper pathophysiological understanding, support clinical decision-making, and prompt the incorporation of precision medicine by enabling a more precise individual phenotyping. In this state-of-the-art review, the recent advances in circulating biomarkers in pulmonary arterial hypertension from a clinical perspective are discussed, with particular emphasis on the current state of knowledge, gaps in evidence, and future perspectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed et al. (2024) conducted a review in Pulmonary arterial hypertension. Circulating biomarkers was evaluated. Novel circulating biomarkers in pulmonary arterial hypertension may provide deeper pathophysiological understanding, support clinical decision-making, and enable precision medicine.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: