This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Gut-microbiome-inflammation interactions have been linked to neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other disorders. We hypothesized that treatment with rifaximin, a minimally absorbed gut-specific antibiotic, may modify the neurodegenerative process by changing gut flora and reducing neurotoxic microbial drivers of inflammation. In a pilot, open-label trial, we treated 10 subjects with mild to moderate probable AD dementia (MMSE = 17 ± 3) with rifaximin for 3 months. Treatment was associated with a significant reduction in serum neurofilament-light levels (p <0.004) and a significant increase in fecal phylum Firmicutes microbiota. Serum pTau181 and GFAP levels were reduced (effect sizes of -0.41 and -0.48 respectively) but did not reach significance. There was also a non-significant downward trend in serum cytokine IL-6 and IL-13 levels. Increases in stool Erysipelatoclostridium were correlated significantly with reductions in serum pTau 181 and serum GFAP. Insights from this pilot trial are being used to design a larger placebo-controlled clinical trial to determine if specific microbial flora/products underlie neurodegeneration, and whether rifaximin is clinically efficacious as a therapeutic. Research in Context Systematic Review PubMed reviews showed emerging evidence for gut-microbiome-inflammation links in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Interpretation Our pilot study revealed that rifaximin, a minimally absorbed, gut-specific antibiotic, reduced surrogate markers of neurodegeneration while increasing, potentially beneficial, microbiota in phylum Firmicutes. These data provide initial support to the hypothesis that microbiome related products may play a role in neurodegenerative disorders. Future Directions We plan to conduct additional human and pre-clinical studies to confirm these findings and determine the potential of rifaximin as a therapeutic for AD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suhocki et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: