Key result
Baseline cortisol and self-reported stress levels predicted individual physiological resilience to acute socioevaluative stress with 62.5% accuracy.
Why the study?
Does socioevaluative stress (TSST) increase physiological and self-reported stress responses during subsequent virtual military training tasks in healthy adults?
RCT (n=40)
Randomly assigned
No
Does socioevaluative stress (TSST) increase physiological and self-reported stress responses during subsequent virtual military training tasks in healthy adults?
Effect estimate: 62.5% classification accuracy
Physiological reactivity to acute socioevaluative stress can be used to classify individual resilience and identify those at risk for stress-related performance deficits.
May enable early identification of individuals at risk for stress-related performance deficits; extends RCT evidence on resilience predictors.
Human task performance is affected by exposure to physiological and psychological stress. The ability to measure the physiological response to stressors and correlate that to task performance could be used to identify resilient individuals or those at risk for stress-related performance decrements. Accomplishing this prior to performance under severe stress or the development of clinical stress disorders could facilitate focused preparation such as tailoring training to individual needs. Here we measure the effects of stress on physiological response and performance through behavior, physiological sensors, and subjective ratings, and identify which individuals are at risk for stress-related performance decrements. Participants performed military-relevant training tasks under stress in a virtual environment, with autonomic and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) reactivity analyzed. Self-reported stress, as well as physiological indices of stress, increased in the group pre-exposed to socioevaluative stress. Stress response was effectively captured via electrodermal and cardiovascular measures of heart rate and skin conductance level. A resilience classification algorithm was developed based upon physiological reactivity, which correlated with baseline unstressed physiological and self-reported stress values. Outliers were identified in the experimental group that had a significant mismatch between self-reported stress and salivary cortisol. Baseline stress measurements were predictive of individual resilience to stress, including the impact stress had on physiological reactivity and performance. Such an approach may have utility in identifying individuals at risk for problems performing under severe stress. Continuing work has focused on adapting this method for military personnel, and assessing the utility of various coping and decision-making strategies on performance and physiological stress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winslow et al. (2015) conducted an RCT in Healthy (Stress resilience) (n=40). Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) vs. Placebo TSST was evaluated on Prediction of individual resilience to stress using baseline cortisol and self-reported stress (STAI) (62.5% classification accuracy). Baseline cortisol and self-reported stress levels predicted individual physiological resilience to acute socioevaluative stress with 62.5% accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: