Key result
The Danish version of the Inventory of Hyperacusis Symptoms demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95) and acceptable test-retest reliability for assessing hyperacusis.
Why the study?
This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the Inventory of Hyperacusis into Danish and assess its usability, validity, and reliability in Danish adults with hyperacusis.
Is the Danish version of the Inventory of Hyperacusis Symptoms a reliable and valid tool for assessing hyperacusis in Danish adults?
Observational (n=32)
Is the Danish version of the Inventory of Hyperacusis Symptoms a reliable and valid tool for assessing hyperacusis in Danish adults?
Effect estimate: Cronbach's alpha = 0.95
The Danish version of the Inventory of Hyperacusis Symptoms is a reliable and valid tool for assessing hyperacusis impact in clinical and research settings.
Enables Danish hyperacusis assessment with a validated tool; leaves open broader clinical outcome testing.
Background/Objectives: This study aimed to (i) cross-culturally adapt the Inventory of Hyperacusis (IHS) into Danish and (ii) assess its usability, validity, and reliability in Danish adults with hyperacusis. Methods: The translation followed established guidelines for adapting hearing-related questionnaires. A two-phase design ensured linguistic and cultural adaptation and evaluated test–retest reliability and construct validity. The IHS, consisting of 25 items, was translated and tested in seven participants through cognitive debriefing. In phase two, temporal consistency was assessed in 32 patients. Results: Thirty-two participants (twenty-eight female; mean age 49.8 years) completed the study over 2–4 weeks (mean 22 days). Eight used hearing aids, and twenty-four reported tinnitus. The Danish IHS showed good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.95) and acceptable test–retest reliability, except for the General Loudness factor. While no systematic score changes occurred, significant variability in score changes were noted. Conclusions: The Danish IHS appears to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing hyperacusis. Further research is needed, but the IHS-DK shows potential as an effective clinical and research tool for evaluating hyperacusis impact and treatment outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosing et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Hyperacusis (n=32). Danish version of Inventory of Hyperacusis Symptoms (IHS-DK) was evaluated on Reliability (Cronbach's alpha) (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95). The Danish version of the Inventory of Hyperacusis Symptoms demonstrated good internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95) and acceptable test-retest reliability for assessing hyperacusis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: