Why the study?
Does health-care payer type affect the rate of operative treatment and surgeons' work intensity for patients with orthopaedic conditions?
Observational (n=230,306)
Does health-care payer type affect the rate of operative treatment and surgeons' work intensity for patients with orthopaedic conditions?
Health-care payer type has little effect on the rate of operative treatment and surgeons' work intensity in orthopaedic practice after adjusting for diagnosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Payer type minimally affects operative rates after diagnosis adjustment; leaves open unmeasured influences on orthopaedic treatment decisions.
Does health-care payer type affect the rate of operative treatment and surgeons' work intensity for patients with orthopaedic conditions? We analyzed the clinical and financial data collected during 6 consecutive years (1999-2004) for a group practice of 40 orthopaedic surgeons. We examined the rate of operative treatment and surgeons' work intensity (total physician's work Resource-based Relative Value System units) by diagnosis, patient age, and payer type. The eight payer types were: capitation health maintenance organization, health maintenance organization, preferred provider organization, indemnity, self-pay, Workers' Compensation, Medicaid, and Medicare. There were 230,306 patients with 526 unique primary diagnoses. Diagnosis accounted for most of the variability in operative rates and surgeons' work intensity. After adjusting for differences attributable to diagnosis, payer type had little effect on the rate of operative treatment and surgeons' work intensity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brinker et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Orthopaedic conditions (n=230,306). Payer type was evaluated on Rate of operative treatment and surgeons' work intensity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: