Key result
Post-insult administration of rosiglitazone did not significantly reduce blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, or acute tubular injury compared to cisplatin alone (p>0.05).
Why the study?
Does rosiglitazone prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in male Sprague-Dawley rats?
RCT (n=18)
Randomly divided
Does rosiglitazone prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in male Sprague-Dawley rats?
p-value: p=>0.05
Rosiglitazone does not appear to prevent or reduce the severity of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in a rat model.
Rosiglitazone post-cisplatin does not attenuate nephrotoxicity in rats; leaves open PPARγ agonism for preventing chemotherapy AKI in humans.
AIM: Nephrotoxicity is a major side effect of cisplatin (Cis), a widely used chemotherapeutic drug. Recent studies have strongly suggested that inflammatory mechanisms may play an important role in the pathogenesis of Cis nephrotoxicity. Rosiglitazone (Ros), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist has been recently demonstrated to regulate inflammation by modulating the production of inflammatory mediators and adhesion molecules. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Ros on the prevention of Cis-induced nephrotoxicity. METHODS: Eighteen male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 150-200 g were included in the study. The rats were randomly divided into three groups: group 1: Cis-treated group; group 2: Cis-Ros-treated group; group 3: saline-treated group. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine concentrations were measured. In addition, extent of histological renal tubular injury in each animal was graded histologically. RESULTS: Mean BUN and serum creatinine concentrations were significantly lower in group 3 than in group 1 (p<0.05) and group 2 (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of BUN and serum creatinine concentrations between groups 1 and 2 (p>0.05). Acute tubular injury with karyomegalic changes in corticomedullary junction was significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 than group 3 (p<0.05). However, there were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2 (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that post-insult administration of Ros does not seem to have a beneficial effect on prevention and severity of nephrotoxicity induced by Cis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özkaya et al. (2010) conducted an RCT in Cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity (n=18). Rosiglitazone vs. Cisplatin alone was evaluated on Blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum creatinine concentrations, and histological renal tubular injury (p=>0.05). Post-insult administration of rosiglitazone did not significantly reduce blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, or acute tubular injury compared to cisplatin alone (p>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: