Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Resistance was induced in barley by virulent and avirulent Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei and by E. graminis f. sp. tritici. The diameters of fluorescent haloes and papillae at the site of the primary germ tube of the inducers were larger until 12 hours after inoculation with E g. f. sp. tritici than in the corresponding periods after inoculation with E. g. f. sp. hordei. Fluorescence at the site of appressorial lobes of the inducers developed, gradually from 10 and 12 hours after inoculation with E. g. f. sp. hordei and E. g. f. sp. tritici , respectively. Penetration success of single infection units of the challenger was reduced in cells with inducer fluorescence, suggesting that resistance is principally localized to cells previously attacked by the inducer. But penetration success was independent of the average distance to the ten nearest inducer fluorescences, and penetration failures did also occur in cells without inducer fluorescence, suggesting that the induced resistance to some extent is translocated to other epidermal cells. The average diameter of the fluorescent papillae at the site of unsuccessful challenger infection units increased as a result of induced resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thordal‐Christensen et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: