Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To find out the optimal strategy for the preoperative location of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENTS: 282 patients operated on for histologically confirmed pheochromocytoma in France between 1980 and 1991, the past decade. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The results of imaging procedures, i.e. computed tomography (CT), (131)I meta-iodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy (MIBG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were reviewed. RESULTS: Pheochromocytomas were sporadic in 206 (73%). They were unilateral in 189 (67%), bilateral in 54 (19%) and extra-adrenal in 39 (14%). Overall sensitivity of the studies was 89% for CT, 98% for MRI, and 81% for (131)I-MIBG. In unilateral adrenal lesions sensitivity were 100% for CT and MRI, and 88% for (131)I-MIBG; in bilateral lesions 66% for CT, 100% for MRI, and 62% for (131)I-MIBG; in extra-adrenal lesions 64% for CT, 88% for MRI, and 64% for (131)I-MIBG. CONCLUSION: The accuracy with which pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas can be visualized questions nowadays the routine use of abdominal approach. In selected cases of sporadic unilateral chromaffin tumours, a posterior, lateral, or even laparoscopic approach should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jalil et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: