Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acid‐thinned wheat, potato, and pea starches prepared by variation of acid type (HCl and H 2 SO 4 ), concentration (0.36 and 0.72 N in a 40% w/w suspension), and hydrolysis time (4 and 24 h) were characterized in terms of water binding properties. Hydrolysis decreased the water content bound by sorption at water activity ( a W ) 1.0, at which the water was detected to be non‐freezable ( w nf ) using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The decrease of w nf due to hydrolysis was in the order potato > wheat > pea starch. The modification changed the ability to certain granule swelling as well as porosity and void volume of the starch ballast affecting the water uptake based on capillary suction properties (WHC CS ) and the water hydration capacity (WHC C ). Decreasing WHC C was found systematically by enhancing the hydrolysis time for wheat and potato starches. Incremental molecular degradation including partial debranching in the threshold area between amorphous and crystalline regions promotes re‐organization of helices near the crystallite surface reducing granule swelling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ulbrich et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: