Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effects of chloramphenicol (CAP) on the progress of thymineless death (TLD), nalidixic acid (NA) inactivation, ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, and mitomycin C (MC) inactivation were studied in Escherichia coli B, B(s-1), B(s-3), B(s-12), and B/r. This was done before, during, and after inactivation. During the progress of inactivation, it was found that at 10 to 20 mug of CAP per ml, up to 50% of the UV-sensitive bacteria survived TLD and about 10% survived NA. In E. coli B/r, at these concentrations of CAP, about 10 to 15% of the cells survived TLD and about 20 to 25% survived NA. Concentrations of CAP greater than 25 mug/ml actually increased the sensitivity of E. coli B, B(s-1), B(s-3), and B(s-12) to inactivation by either TLD or NA; at 150 mug of CAP per ml, the sensitivity of E. coli B/r to inactivation also increased. When E. coli B cells were incubated in CAP prior to inactivation, the longer the preincubation the longer onset of TLD was delayed; NA inactivation was also affected in that the rate of inactivation after CAP incubation was greatly decreased. Preincubation of E. coli B/r with CAP had much less effect on the progress of inactivation. After thymineless death, incubation in CAP plus thymine led to a rapid and almost complete recovery of E. coli B and B(s-12). Lesser recoveries were observed after inactivation due to UV, NA, or MC inactivation. E. coli B(s-1) and B/r did not recover viability after any mode of inactivation, and E. coli B(s-3) and B(s-12) recovered from UV to about 20% of the initial titer. It was suggested that protein synthesis, in particular proteins involved in deoxyribonucleic synthesis, was a determining factor in these inactivating and recovery events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cummings et al. (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: