Why the study?
High-voltage impedance is associated with S-ICD defibrillation efficacy, but whether newly introduced automatic long-term low-voltage impedance measurements can serve as a surrogate was unknown.
Does low-voltage impedance (LVI) measurement serve as an accurate surrogate for high-voltage impedance (HVI) in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators?
Does low-voltage impedance (LVI) measurement serve as an accurate surrogate for high-voltage impedance (HVI) in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators?
Low-voltage impedance measurements show strong agreement with high-voltage impedance in S-ICD recipients, suggesting LVI can serve as a noninvasive surrogate for monitoring defibrillation efficacy.
Background: High-voltage impedance (HVI), measured during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation via defibrillation testing or a synchronized shock, is associated with defibrillation efficacy. Recently, S-ICD systems have been upgraded to automatically perform long-term measurements of low-voltage impedance (LVI) using a 1-V subthreshold pulse. Objective: This study evaluated LVI as a surrogate for HVI and described its long-term trends in S-ICD recipients. Methods: We analyzed data from 1226 patients who underwent de novo S-ICD implantation across 15 Italian centers. Weekly averages of LVI and HVI were calculated, and agreement between simultaneous measurements was assessed. Higher LVI values were observed in overweight/obese patients when subcutaneous device positioning and the 3-incision lead deployment technique were used. Similarly, higher values were obtained when significant subcoil fat was observed and the Prospective, RAndomizEd comparison of subcuTaneOus and tRansvenous ImplANtable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy score was ≥90. Conclusion: LVI showed strong agreement with HVI during follow-up, supporting its potential use as a noninvasive surrogate for HVI. LVI increased during the initial postimplantation period and subsequently stabilized, possibly reflecting physiological changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mugnai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: