Why the study?
This study aimed to develop a new computerized assessment battery for cognition (C-ABC) to detect mild cognitive impairment and dementia in a short time.
Does a new computerized assessment battery for cognition (C-ABC) accurately detect mild cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults?
Does a new computerized assessment battery for cognition (C-ABC) accurately detect mild cognitive impairment and dementia in older adults?
The C-ABC is a rapid, 2-to-5 minute computerized tool that can accurately distinguish mild cognitive impairment and dementia from normal cognition across different age groups.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study aimed to develop a new computerized assessment battery for cognition (C-ABC) to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. We performed C-ABC in subjects with dementia (n = 422), MCI (n = 145), and normal cognition (NC; n = 574), and analyzed by age stratum (50s, 60s, and 70-85 years). To distinguish MCI from NC, the C-ABC total combined score, which were calculated by dividing the C-ABC total score by the C-ABC required time, revealed the best area under the curves (AUC) at 0.838 and 0.735 in the 50s and 60s age groups, respectively; notably, this entire procedure took approximately 5 min. To distinguish dementia from NC and MCI, the partial items of C-ABC (items 3 + 6 combined score) revealed the best AUCs at 0.910, 0.874, and 0.882 in the 50s, 60s, and 70-85 age groups, respectively. Furthermore, the items 3 + 6 combined score established the best AUC at 0.794 in the 70-85 age group to distinguish MCI from NC; this entire procedure took around 2 min. Hence, this study suggests that C-ABC could be a useful tool for detecting dementia or MCI in a short time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support rapid cognitive screening in older adults; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noguchi‐Shinohara et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: