Why the study?
Bleeding and transfusions frequently complicate cardiac surgery in India, creating a need for standardized bleeding management strategies tailored to low-resource settings.
These 26 consensus-based recommendations provide the first comprehensive, India-specific guidelines for managing bleeding during cardiac surgery using both viscoelastic and conventional testing.
Standardizes perioperative bleeding management in Indian cardiac surgery; extends international guidelines with the first local consensus algorithms.
India conducts around 240,000 adult cardiac surgeries annually, with bleeding and transfusions being common complications that can worsen outcomes. Implementing patient blood management strategies can reduce unnecessary transfusions and improve results. With emerging management options and point-of-care testing, the need for standardized bleeding management during cardiac surgery in India became evident. The Blood Clot (Indian Bleeding Management during Cardiac Surgery) Working Group convened 3 times (one in-person, two virtual) to discuss and vote on consensus-based recommendation statements derived from a Delphi process. The online Delphi platform enabled anonymous voting, providing real-time statistical insights during discussions. Using the accurate consensus reporting document methodology, 26 recommendations were finalized, covering pre-, intra-, and post-operative bleeding management. The recommendations included both Thrombelastography (TEG)/Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and non-TEG/ROTEM-based algorithms, along with specific guidance for managing bleeding in cyanotic congenital heart disease surgery. These consensus-based recommendations represent the first comprehensive, India-specific guidelines for managing bleeding during cardiac surgery, aiming to optimize practices and potentially set a new standard of care. This approach could also influence global practices in similar contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kapoor et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: