Ischemic Versus Nonischemic Recipient Indication Does Not Impact Outcome After Heart Transplantation

OBJECTIVES: Heart transplant is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage heart failure who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. The primary indications for heart transplant worldwide have been nonischemic cardiomyopathy and ischemic cardiomyopathy. For the 2 indications, patients differ in underlying pathomechanisms leading to their disease and consecutively in relevant comorbidities. However, the influence of an indication of ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy for heart transplant on recipient outcomes posttransplant remains controversial. Here, we investigated whether ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy indication were associated with patient morbidity and mortality after heart transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all patients undergoing heart transplant in our center between September 2010 and June 2021 (n = 218). Recipients were divided into 2 groups related to their indication: ischemic (n = 92; 42%) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 126; 58%). Recipient and donor variables were reviewed and compared, including peri- and postoperative characteristics and recipient survival up to 5 years posttransplant. RESULTS: Although patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were significantly younger (51.7 vs 59.1 years; P < .001), had fewer previous cardiac surgeries (56% vs 75%; P = .01), and less frequent severe infections or sepsis (19% vs 32%; P = .03), other outcome-related parameters such as need for extracorporeal life support posttransplant (26% vs 33%), rejection within index stay (7% vs 8%), and survival after 30 days (88% vs 92%), 90 days (85% vs 88%) or 1 year (76% vs 77%) were different. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis, although barring different baseline characteristics, ischemic versus nonischemic recipient diagnosis was not associated with outcome or survival after heart transplant.