Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of this work was to investigate the epidemiological and genetic characteristics of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-Kp) causing community-onset infections. K. pneumoniae isolates were collected from 31 Chinese secondary hospitals between August 2010 and August 2011. Genes encoding ESBL and AmpC beta-lactamases were detected by PCR. The isolates were assigned to sequence types (ST) using multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) and plasmid content was determined by PCR-based replicon typing. Eleven ESBL-Kp strains representing were selected to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for investigating the genetic environment and plasmids encoding ESBL genes. A total of 578 K. pneumoniae isolates were collected, and 184 (31.8%) carried ESBL genes. The prevalence of ESBL-Kp varied from different geographical areas of China (10.2%-50.3%). The three most prevalent ESBL genes were blaCTX-M-14 (n=74), blaCTX-M-15 (n=60), and blaCTX-M-3 (n=40). MLST assigned 127 CTX-M-14 and CTX-M-15 producers to 54 STs, and CC17 was the most prevalent population (12.6%). STs (23, 37 and 86) that were known frequently associating with hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hvKP) account for 14.1% (18/127). Phylogenetic analysis by concatenating the 7 loci of MLST revealed the existence of ESBL-producing K. quasipneumoniae (2 strains) and K. varricola (1 strain), which was further confirmed by WGS. IncFII type (n=130, 70.7%) was the predominant plasmid replicon. WGS analysis revealed various transmission mechanisms employed by different CTX-M genes. This study highlights the challenge of community-onset infections caused by ESBL-Kp in China. The prevalence of STs frequently associating with hvKP should be of concern. Surveillance of ESBL-KP causing community-onset infections now appears imperative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: