Why the study?
Does surgical treatment improve survival and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac metastases?
Does surgical treatment improve survival and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiac metastases?
Surgical intervention for cardiac metastases is safe and provides acceptable survival, with long-term outcomes likely dependent on control of the primary malignancy.
Supports surgical feasibility in cardiac metastases; leaves open whether resection improves outcomes versus systemic therapy alone.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac metastases are more common than primary malignant tumors of the heart and are usually treated surgically as a palliative approach. In this study, we reviewed our experience with the surgical treatment of patients with cardiac metastases of various types of malignant tumors. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2016, 10 patients underwent surgery for cardiac metastases at our institution. RESULTS: = 7). In only six patients, the primary malignancy was known at the time of cardiac surgery. The interval between the first diagnosis of the primary tumor and cardiac metastases ranged from simultaneous diagnosis to up to 19 years. At the time of the diagnosis of the cardiac metastases, seven patients already had multiple metastases: all seven patients had pulmonary metastases, and three of them additionally had hepatic, cerebral, or osseous metastases. Only four patients were symptomatic (atrial fibrillation, pericardial effusion, tachycardia with chest pain, dyspnea). There was no in-hospital death. The postoperative course was uneventful overall. The one- and two-year survival rates were similar, that is, 76%. The median follow-up time was 5.4 years. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical intervention for treating cardiac metastases is associated with uneventful clinical outcome and acceptable survival in this critically ill population. Control of the primary malignancy, and maybe other metastases, determines the survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mkalaluh et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: