This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A typology is proposed regarding the modes of access to water for the rural population in Chile as well as four explanatory dimensions of its heterogeneity. The typology emerges from a systematic review of the literature and an analysis of quantitative data based on rural water organizations' databases. The modes of access are defined by the following five criteria: their socio-technical system, their type of management, their level of spatial action, the source of their financing, and the type of technical assistance they received. The findings dispute the systemic vision of access to water in rural areas and invite us to consider the structural heterogeneity in regulations and public policies to guarantee the human right to water.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicolas-Artero et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: