Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A cohort of 112 men presenting with acute non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) was investigated for the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis. Men with 3 or more episodes of NGU in the preceding 12 months, or who had received treatment for NGU in the preceding 3 months were excluded. C. trachomatis was sought by examination of urethral smears by direct immunofluorescence, and by examination of the centrifuged deposit from a first pass urine (FPU) sample by direct immunofluorescence, IDEIA, and the polymerase chain reaction. Urethral samples from 48 men were positive for CT, and the FPU samples from an additional 7 men were positive by at least 2 assays. With such intensive investigation it is likely that those men identified as chlamydia-negative were genuinely free from the infection. The clinical history and response to treatment of those men who were chlamydia-positive were compared with those of the chlamydia-negative men. They differed in that a larger proportion of the chlamydia-positive men reported having had intercourse with more than one partner in the previous 3 months, and having had fewer previous episodes of NGU. Moreover, in contrast to some previous studies, after one week of treatment with doxycycline, a larger proportion (65%) of the chlamydia-negative men than the chlamydia-positive men (40%) was cured, although the difference was not sustained following later treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hay et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: