Why the study?
Existing explainability methods for deep learning classifiers trained on raw electrophysiology data only attribute importance to frequency bands and fail to provide insight into actual spectral values or relationships between learned spectral features.
The FAME approach provides a novel method for explaining deep learning classifiers trained on raw electrophysiology time-series by optimizing their spectral content.
May improve clinician trust in CNN sleep staging; extends explainable AI to raw electrophysiology but remains hypothesis-generating.
Spectral analysis remains a hallmark approach for gaining insight into electrophysiology modalities like electroencephalography (EEG). As the field of deep learning has progressed, more studies have begun to train deep learning classifiers on raw EEG data, which presents unique problems for explainability. A growing number of studies have presented explainability approaches that provide insight into the spectral features learned by deep learning classifiers. However, existing approaches only attribute importance to different frequency bands. Most of the methods cannot provide insight into the actual spectral values or the relationship between spectral features that models have learned. Here, we present a novel adaptation of activation maximization for electrophysiology time-series that generates samples that indicate the features learned by classifiers by optimizing their spectral content. We evaluate our approach within the context of EEG sleep stage classification with a convolutional neural network, and we find that our approach is able to identify spectral patterns known to be associated with each sleep stage. We also find surprising results suggesting that our classifier may have prioritized the use of eye and motion artifact when identifying Awake samples. Our approach is the first adaptation of activation maximization to the domain of raw electrophysiology classification. Additionally, our approach has implications for explaining any classifier trained on highly dynamic, long time-series.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellis et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: