Why the study?
Do prophylactic antibiotics prevent bacterial sepsis in patients undergoing heart surgery?
Do prophylactic antibiotics prevent bacterial sepsis in patients undergoing heart surgery?
This editorial highlights the controversy and historical lack of success regarding the general use of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent infection in surgical procedures and other clinical circumstances.
Although there is uniform agreement on the profound beneficial effects of antibiotics for treating bacterial infections, it is remarkable how much controversy still surrounds the use of these agents in preventing bacterial sepsis. The case for using a specific antibiotic like penicillin to prevent infection by a single pathogen such as the Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus is well established.1 In contrast, the more general use of antibiotics to prevent "infection" in a variety of clinical circumstances such as coma, congestive heart failure or surgical procedures has been disappointingly unsuccessful when examined critically in controlled prospective studies.2 , 3 The article by Goodman . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 1968 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: