Why the study?
Does measurement of stimulus duration and rate discriminate between types of pacemaker lead failure?
Does measurement of stimulus duration and rate discriminate between types of pacemaker lead failure?
Measuring stimulus duration and rate in load-sensitive pacemaker generators can help classify lead failures early without requiring oscilloscope equipment.
May enable early pacemaker lead failure classification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Damage to electrode leads in implanted cardiac pacemakers is commonly deduced from diminished and distorted stimulus artefacts. These changes may not occur and do not discriminate between fractured wire and ruptured insulation. Moreover, amplitudes vary from other causes and diagnosis from shape changes requires experience and oscilloscope equipment. The two types of lead damage cause opposite changes in the loading of the stimulus generator. For a few generators the stimulus duration and rate are load-sensitive, although the circuit is otherwise very stable, and simple measurement of these two temporal features can indicate and classify a failure, often in a latent stage before pacing failure has occurred.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
F. Hepburn (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: