Why the study?
Patients undergoing TAVR are at high risk for bleeding and cerebrovascular complications, but there is no clear evidence on the best antithrombotic regimen.
Does antithrombotic therapy reduce thromboembolic events without excessive bleeding in patients undergoing TAVR?
Does antithrombotic therapy reduce thromboembolic events without excessive bleeding in patients undergoing TAVR?
While current guidelines recommend DAPT after TAVR, emerging evidence suggests SAPT may reduce bleeding without increasing ischemic risks, pending results from ongoing randomized trials.
May support SAPT to reduce bleeding after TAVR; leaves open optimal regimen until randomized trials report.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has recently emerged as an effective alternative to medical treatment or surgical aortic valve replacement in all symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and high or prohibitive risk and in intermediate risk when transfemoral access is feasible. Patients undergoing TAVR are often at high risk for either bleeding or cerebrovascular complications, or both, so adjuvant antithrombotic therapies are commonly used before, during and after the procedure. Today, there is no clear evidence on the best antithrombotic regimen in this context. In this review, we will try to go through the mechanisms involved in bleeding and embolic complications and we will discuss the current points of antithrombotic treatment in patients during and after TAVR, with or without oral anticoagulation (OAC) indication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valvo et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: