Why the study?
Does internal jugular access prevent long-term venous strictures compared to subclavian access for temporary dialysis catheters?
Does internal jugular access prevent long-term venous strictures compared to subclavian access for temporary dialysis catheters?
Internal jugular access for temporary dialysis catheters is superior to subclavian access due to a significantly lower risk of long-term venous strictures and occlusions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Internal jugular access was associated with fewer venous strictures than subclavian; hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation before changing temporary dialysis catheter practice.
We studied angiographically the access route 1-27 months after the insertion temporary dialysis catheters in 52 patients: 32 subclavian and 20 internal jugular. The two groups were statistically similar with respect to age, sex and race. The subclavian catheters were left in for a mean of 11.5 days (2-22) while the internal jugular ones were inserted for 15.8 days (5-25; p = 0.0015). One hundred percent of the internal jugular patients were free of any venogram abnormalities in their venous access return. In marked contrast, 50% of the subclavian sites had mild to severe stricutures with 90% having 70-100% occlusion of the subclavian vein. Six patients had bilateral severe strictures. The long-term stricture rate of subclavian catheters in the subclavian vein was unacceptably high compared to the internal jugular route.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cimochowski et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: