Why the study?
Does real-time ultrasound-guided venipuncture reduce vascular access complications in women aged ≥75 years undergoing AF ablation under uninterrupted anticoagulation compared to landmark-based access?
Does real-time ultrasound-guided venipuncture reduce vascular access complications in women aged ≥75 years undergoing AF ablation under uninterrupted anticoagulation compared to landmark-based access?
Supports ultrasound-guided access to mitigate bleeding risk in vulnerable older women undergoing AF ablation; leaves.
Background: After the age of 75 years, about 60% of the people with atrial fibrillation (AF) are women. Female gender is also a known independent predictor of vascular complications in AF patients undergoing catheter ablation. Real-time ultrasound allows direct visualization of vascular structures. Thus, it is logical that it can reduce the inadvertent trauma to the femoral vein and artery thereby decreasing the vascular complications, especially in patients under anticoagulant therapy. Objective: We evaluated the rate of vascular complications in traditional landmark-based and the ultrasound (US)-guided venipuncture in women ≥75 years undergoing AF ablation. Methods: A total of 496 women aged ≥75 years undergoing femoral vein-access for AF ablation were included in this retrospective analysis and classified to group 1: landmark-based access: n=217 and group 2: US-guided access: n=279. The primary endpoint was vascular access complications requiring intervention such as hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula and access bleeding needing blood transfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohanty et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: