Why the study?
Does a combined index of heart rate variability and oximetry (CODI) improve screening accuracy for sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome compared to oximetry alone in patients with suspected SAHS?
Does a combined index of heart rate variability and oximetry (CODI) improve screening accuracy for sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome compared to oximetry alone in patients with suspected SAHS?
A combined index of heart rate variability and oximetry (CODI) provides a highly accurate screening tool for sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome, performing better than standard 4% oximetry dips.
Supports CODI evaluation for SAHS screening; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Many sleep centres employ a preliminary screening test in order to reduce the number of polysomnographies required in the routine diagnosis of the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (SAHS). We investigated the combination of heart rate and oximetry information as a means of performing this test. A retrospective study of 100 patients with suspected SAHS was made. All patients had in-hospital polysomnography on one night. We estimated the number of respiratory event-related arousals by counting the number of autonomic arousals (assessed on the basis of changes in the heart interbeat interval) that were coincident with a rise in oximetry. The hourly index of such events was denoted the "cardiac-oximetry disturbance index" (CODI). The median apnoea/hypopnoea index (AHI) was 16.5 (range 1.0-93.6) h-1. The CODI correlated significantly with the AHI (Spearman correlation coefficient rs = 0.88, P < 0.01), and the area (+/- standard error) under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was 0.94 +/- 0.05. Oximetry alone (based on 4% dips) was a less effective screening test (rs = 0.80, P < 0.01; area under ROC 0.83 +/- 0.06). Using 2% dips in oximetry offered comparable performance with the CODI (rs = 0.91, P < 0.01; area under ROC 0.93 +/- 0.04). The CODI was better correlated with the electroencephalograph arousal index (rs = 0.84, P < 0.01) than was oximetry (2% dips, rs = 0.57, P < 0.01). The CODI algorithm also offers an informal measure of self-validation: a large discrepancy between the number of autonomic arousals and the number of rises in oximetry indicates the presence of autonomic arousals without changes in oximetry (or vice versa). This self-validation mechanism identified several patients in this study, and may be useful in identifying sleep disruption due to chronic pain or other causes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raymond et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: