In patients with persistent valvular AF undergoing valve surgery, surgical radiofrequency ablation has a 38.1% late recurrence rate, which is strongly predicted by longer AF duration, larger left atrial diameter, higher BNP, and lower heart rate.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Identifies preoperative structural and chronicity markers that may help stratify recurrence risk after surgical.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) adversely affects surgical outcomes of cardiac valve surgery. Surgical ablation is an effective way to treat valvular AF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the late outcome of surgical radiofrequency ablation and explore the risk factors of AF recurrence in Chinese patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery. METHODS: Three hundred ninety six consecutive patients with persistent valvular AF were enrolled in this study. They underwent concomitant modified Maze IV and were completed follow-ups. Cox survival regression model was used to screen independent risk factors for predicting late recurrence of AF. RESULTS: During the follow-up period of 28 (6 ~ 61) months, AF recurred in 151 patients (38.1%). In multivariate survival regression, factors predictive of AF late recurrence were AF duration, pre-operative serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), pre-operative heart rate and left atrial diameter (LAD), post-operative atrial tachyarrhythmias and AF at discharge. According to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the best cutoff values for AF duration, BNP, heart rate and LAD were 66.5 months, 251 pg/ml, 82 beats/min and 67.9 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Longer AF duration, larger LAD, higher BNP level and lower heart rate indicated a poor late outcome of surgical radiofrequency ablation in persistent AF patients undergoing cardiac valve surgery. Therefore, indication to radiofrequency ablation should be carefully considered in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cao et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: