Why the study?
Metrics for completeness of cardiac antiarrhythmic ablation lesions are needed to guide ablation therapy.
Do specific analyses of extracellular bipolar cardiac potentials provide metrics for the completeness of radiofrequency ablation lesions in fibrillation?
Do specific analyses of extracellular bipolar cardiac potentials provide metrics for the completeness of radiofrequency ablation lesions in fibrillation?
Analysis of extracellular cardiac potentials, specifically variances in dominant frequency and translesion stimulus-excitation delays, may provide useful metrics to assess the completeness of radiofrequency ablation lesions.
May support metrics for ablation completeness in experimental fibrillation; hypothesis-generating and requires human validation.
Metrics for completeness of cardiac antiarrhythmic ablation lesions are needed to guide ablation therapy. Extracellular bipolar cardiac potentials were measured on either side of the lesion in isolated rabbit hearts (N=25). Three analyses of the signals were examined as possible metrics. Variances in dominant frequency of fibrillatory recordings decreased after ablation by factors of 1.51 for the frequency-domain analysis using the Fast-Fourier Transform; and 1.45 for the time-domain analysis using intervals between super-threshold peaks. This suggests an increase in organization of fibrillation. Morphologies of the signals from different sides of the lesion examined with cross-correlation indicated no consistent change in morphology before vs. after ablation. Slow pacing to determine translesion stimulus-excitation delays (TED) showed that mean TED increased post-ablation, consistent with increased conduction path length. During fibrillation, no consistent change in TED was observed. Thus, certain metrics may be useful to distinguish lesion completeness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sevan Mark Abashian (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: