Why the study?
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MBF and MPR measured from low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging using a whole-heart coverage CT scanner for detecting functionally significant CAD.
Does low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced CT myocardial perfusion imaging accurately detect functionally significant coronary artery disease in patients with suspected or known CAD?
Does low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced CT myocardial perfusion imaging accurately detect functionally significant coronary artery disease in patients with suspected or known CAD?
Quantitative rest and stress myocardial perfusion measurement with a large-coverage CT scanner provides high diagnostic accuracy for detecting functionally significant coronary stenosis.
MPR may outperform stress MBF for ischemia detection on CT perfusion; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and perfusion reserve (MPR) measured from low-dose dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging with a whole-heart coverage CT scanner for detecting functionally significant coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS: Twenty one patients with suspected or known CAD had rest and dipyridamole stress MBF measurements with CT and SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and lumen narrowing assessment with coronary angiography (catheter and/or CT based) within 6 weeks. SPECT MBF measurements and coronary angiography were used together as reference to determine the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis. In each CT MPI study, DCE images of the whole heart were acquired with breath-hold using a low-dose acquisition protocol to generate MBF maps. Binomial logistic regression analysis was used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CT-measured MBF and MPR (ratio of stress to rest MBF) for assessing functionally significant coronary stenosis. RESULTS: Mean stress MBF and MPR in ischemic segments were lower than those in non-ischemic segments (1.37 ± 0.34 vs. 2.14 ± 0.64 ml/min/g; 1.56 ± 0.41 vs. 2.53 ± 0.70; p < 0.05 for all). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that MPR (AUC 0.916, 95%CI: 0.885-0.947) had a superior power than stress MBF (AUC 0.869, 95%CI: 0.830-0.909) for differentiating non-ischemic and ischemic myocardial segments (p = 0.045). On a per-vessel and per-segment analysis, concomitant use of MPR and stress MBF thresholds further improved the diagnostic accuracy compared to MPR or stress MBF alone for detecting obstructive coronary lesions (per-vessel: 93.4% vs. 83.6% and 88.5%, respectively; per-segment: 90.0% vs. 83.7% and 83.1%, respectively). The estimated effective dose of a rest and stress CT MPI study was 3.04 and 3.19 mSv respectively. CONCLUSION: Quantitative rest and stress myocardial perfusion measurement with a large-coverage CT scanner improves the diagnostic accuracy for detecting functionally significant coronary stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: