This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
INTRODUCTION: Cryptosporidium species is a zoonotic enteric coccidian parasite recognized as one of the leading causes of childhood diarrhea and increased risk of death in children < 2 years in low-income countries. We evaluated the prevalence and factors associated with environmental contamination and calf infection in Asembo, Western Kenya, and factors that increase exposure to cryptosporidiosis in humans. METHODS: in a cross-sectional study conducted from January to July 2015, we collected fecal specimens from 350 randomly selected calves aged ≤ 6 months old and 187 manure samples from the same farms. We assessed farmers knowledge about Cryptosporidium and collected data on characteristics using structured questionnaires. Modified Ziehl Nielsen staining was used to detect Cryptosporidium oocysts from calves stool and manure. The prevalence of infected calves and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% (CI) were calculated to identify possible factors associated with Cryptosporidium infection; multivariable logistic regression performed to identify factors independently associated with the presence of Cryptosporidium. RESULTS: calves fecal Cryptosporidium prevalence was 8.3% (95% CI: 5.7-11.8) and 7.5% (95% CI: 4.2-12.2) in manure. Odds of infection was higher in calves with loose stool compared to those with normal stool (AOR = 6.1, 95% C.I: 2.2-16.9), calves ≤ 2 months old compared to older calves (AOR=12.7, 95% C.I: 4.5-35.8) and calves in poor sanitation compared to calves in good hygienic conditions (AOR = 9.9, 95% C.I: 3.1-30.7). CONCLUSION: presence of Cryptosporidium species in calves and environment and reported human contact with animals increases zoonotic risk. We recommend further studies that determine specific Cryptosporidium species infecting animals and humans which would better estimate risk of disease transmission to humans.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogendo et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: