Why the study?
Should patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation be switched from vitamin K antagonists to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants?
Should patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation be switched from vitamin K antagonists to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants?
This review provides clinical guidance on identifying patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who would benefit most from switching from VKAs to NOACs and how to do so safely.
May guide switching decisions in non-valvular AF; leaves open prospective validation of recommendations.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important risk factor for thromboembolic events, and anticoagulation therapy can reduce this risk. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), such as warfarin, have been used for decades in patients with AF for stroke prevention. Currently, non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are approved and available for non-valvular AF patients who are at increased risk of stroke. These agents are safe and effective and have important advantages over VKAs, such as significant reduction in intracranial hemorrhage and no need for routine laboratory monitoring. Thus, should all VKA-treated patients be switched to a NOAC? The aims of this article are: 1) to review the advantages of NOACs over VKAs; 2) to identify the group of patients who most benefit from receiving a NOAC and, therefore, are higher priority to be switched from VKAs; and 3) to provide clinical and practical guidance on how to switch patients safely from VKAs to NOACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lópes et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: