Why the study?
Does measuring prothrombin time using specific reagents predict apixaban-associated anticoagulant activity in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Does measuring prothrombin time using specific reagents predict apixaban-associated anticoagulant activity in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Prothrombin time measured with specific reagents can predict apixaban-associated anticoagulant activity in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, despite significant interpatient variability.
PT monitoring with select reagents may track apixaban activity in NVAF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated whether measuring prothrombin time (PT) using particular reagents of interest predicted apixaban-associated anticoagulant activity in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Two reagents, Shinplastin Excel S and Coagpia PT-N, were used to evaluate PT under apixaban therapy. From June 2013 to February 2014, 103 NVAF patients were recruited, and PT was measured at 3 time points: (1) anytime in the outpatient clinic, (2) at peak, and (3) at trough. In spike-in experiments using pooled citrated normal human platelet-poor plasma with these PT reagents, apixaban prolonged PT values in a concentration-dependent manner. PT values significantly correlated between both reagents (r=0.97) in outpatients. PT values in outpatients taking 5-mg apixaban bid were significantly prolonged and had wide inter- and intraindividual variability. Peak values were significantly higher than trough values, with both values higher than normal. The dose change of apixaban from 5 mg bid to 2.5 mg bid in outpatients halved the degree of PT prolongation in each NVAF patient. CONCLUSIONS: The PT value measured by these specific reagents can predict apixaban-associated anticoagulant activity, although there is significant interpatient variability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanemoto et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: