Why the study?
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is often overlooked in unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy, leading to potentially debilitating health consequences.
This case highlights the critical importance of advanced cardiac imaging (CMR) and molecular genetic testing in evaluating unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy to prevent delayed diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and its severe thromboembolic and arrhythmic complications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support genetic testing in unexplained LVH; hypothesis-generating for these variants in HCM and AF.
This case report concerns a 48-year-old man with a history of ischemic stroke at the age of 41 who reported cardiac hypertrophy, registered in his twenties when explained by increased physical activity. Family history was positive for a mother with permanent atrial fibrillation from her mid-thirties. At the age of 44, he had a first episode of persistent atrial fibrillation, accompanied by left atrial thrombosis while on a direct oral anticoagulant. He presented at our clinic at the age of 45 with another episode of persistent atrial fibrillation and decompensated heart failure. Echocardiography revealed a dilated left atrium, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and an asymmetric left ventricular hypertrophy. Cardiac magnetic resonance was positive for a cardiomyopathy with diffuse fibrosis, while slow-flow phenomenon was present on coronary angiography. Genetic testing by whole-exome sequencing revealed three variants in the patient, c.309C > A, p.His103Gln in the ACTC1 gene, c.116T > G, p.Leu39Ter in the PLN gene, and c.5827C > T, p.His1943Tyr in the SCN5A gene, the first two associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and the latter possibly with familial atrial fibrillation. This case illustrates the need for advanced diagnostics in unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy, as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is often overlooked, leading to potentially debilitating health consequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gencheva et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: