Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We tested the efficacy of synthetic host marking pheromone (HMP) of the European cherry fruit fly ( R. cerasi ) as a fruit‐infestation‐reducing‐agent in an experimental cherry orchard. Two different pheromone deployment strategies were compared: covering entire tree canopies with synthetic HMP or treating only one half (top to bottom or lower half) of the tree canopy. Pheromone application caused a tenfold reduction in fruit infestation if the entire tree canopy was covered (0.226 vs 0.021 pupae/fruit in untreated and treated trees, respectively). Results show, nevertheless, that a significant reduction in fruit infestation can be achieved by treating only one half of tree canopies (top to bottom) (0.021 vs 0.048 pupae/fruit when comparing totally vs partially treated trees). We conclude that synthetic cherry fruit fly HMP has potential as a fruit fly management tool, especially in cases where ‘organically’ grown fruit reaches high market values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aluja et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: