Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OVERVIEW:As Eastman Chemical Company faced an increasingly competitive global environment, and stronger demands for new products from a market-oriented, business-centered organization, it was recognized that an improvement in the company's innovation process was necessary. Throughout the company, innovation was generally thought of as an R&D process with relatively poor linkage to marketing and business functions when innovating new growth products. On the other hand, the innovation process for incremental improvement of products worked very well. A systematic quality management process approach was used to redefine innovation as a company-wide system in which many functions, not just R&D, play a critical role. As a result of this effort, the identification of the right thing to work on (that is, the correct product or process needs for a business) was recognized as a major opportunity for improvement. Improvements in this area are being obtained by using multifunctional needs-identification teams and by clearly defining the role of the businesses as owners of innovation, with R&D a facilitator. In addition, opportunities for substantial improvements in efficiency (i.e., reduced cycle time) are being pursued by stronger focus on project management, including early use of informal multifunctional concept development teams.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holmes et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: