Why the study?
Does compression ultrasound effectively diagnose lower-extremity DVT and reduce the need for venography in patients with suspected DVT?
Does compression ultrasound effectively diagnose lower-extremity DVT and reduce the need for venography in patients with suspected DVT?
Compression ultrasound is a reliable diagnostic tool for lower-extremity DVT that significantly reduces the need for venography while increasing DVT detection rates.
May support CU integration to limit venography in suspected DVT; leaves open randomized confirmation of safety and outcomes.
During a 1-year period, 537 compression ultrasound (CU) examinations were performed in 506 extremities of 485 patients for evaluation of possible deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Decisions regarding therapy were based on the result of this test in both outpatients and inpatients. Doppler ultrasound was also used during the last 7 months of the study, but this procedure did not alter the results obtained with CU alone. Incidental findings (eg, Baker cysts, aneurysms, and lymph nodes) were noted in 42 patients and were thought to be nonthrombotic causes of leg swelling or pain that could not be detected with venography. The reliability and clinical acceptance of CU as a means of diagnosing lower-extremity DVT resulted in a 50% yearly reduction in venography, with a concomitant 130% increase in the number of cases of DVT diagnosed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cronan et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: