Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: To compare infection rates in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures using antibiotic impregnated bone cement (AIBC) to those rates in procedures not using AIBC. METHODS: a non-AIBC control group; and (10) articles that were published before 1985. No statistically significant differences existed in Knee Society Scores, Hospital for Special Surgery Scores, or Loosening Rates. CONCLUSION: AIBC did not have a significant effect on primary TKA infection rates. AIBC did have a significant effect on revision TKA infection rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kleppel et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: