Why the study?
What are the financial implications of catheter ablation compared to medical therapy in symptomatic AF patients?
What are the financial implications of catheter ablation compared to medical therapy in symptomatic AF patients?
This review summarizes the financial implications and costs associated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.
AF ablation cost data reviewed; leaves open whether ablation is cost-effective versus medical therapy in symptomatic patients.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common and frequently disabling chronic condition associated with significant patient morbidity and affecting an increasing stratum of our ageing society. Direct costs related to atrial fibrillation are comprised from direct cost of medical therapy, catheter ablation, and related hospitalizations and imaging procedures, with indirect costs related to complications of the primary therapeutic strategy, management of related conditions, as well as disability and loss in quality of life related to AF. Over the last decade, catheter ablation became a promising alternative to rate and rhythm control among symptomatic AF patients. The purpose of this paper is to describe the evidence on the financial implications related to ablation based on published data and authors' experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khaykin et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: