Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Summary The relationship between position in a seating arrangement and group participation was examined in a field setting with use of 198 men and women (college students and adults in the community). A simple central-position hypothesis was compared to one that included both centrality and high visible accessibility by observing groups of three members interact in two different seating arrangements (i.e., either in a booth or around a table). The results indicated that centrality was associated with initiating communications, while high visibility appeared related to receiving communications. Thus, the central-position hypothesis predicted accurately who initiated most communications. The central-position-plus-high-visibility hypothesis, however, appeared superior in predicting who was likely to dominate the overall group interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michelini et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: