Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Global Legal Pluralism recognizes the inevitability (and sometimes even the desirability) of multiple legal and quasi-legal systems purporting to regulate the same act or actor. However, the resulting pluralism—just as inevitably—creates conflicts among norms that are potentially intractable. Thus, legal systems must address how best to respond to the realities of pluralism. This inquiry has constitutional dimensions because it goes to the constitutive character of communities and their relationships with other communities, be they international, transnational, national, subnational, or epistemic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Schiff Berman (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: