Why the study?
Little is known about neuronal (pro)renin receptor function in overnutrition-related metabolic physiology.
Does neuronal PRR deletion reduce blood pressure and improve glucose tolerance in mice fed a high-fat diet?
Does neuronal PRR deletion reduce blood pressure and improve glucose tolerance in mice fed a high-fat diet?
Neuronal PRR deletion in mice on a high-fat diet improves blood pressure and glucose metabolism, highlighting its role in overnutrition-related metabolic pathophysiology.
Neuronal PRR may represent a target in diet-induced hypertension and hyperglycemia; leaves open translation from mice to humans.
We report here that the neuronal (pro)renin receptor (PRR), a key component of the brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS), plays a critical role in the central regulation of high-fat-diet (HFD)-induced metabolic pathophysiology. The neuronal PRR is known to mediate formation of the majority of angiotensin (ANG) II, a key bioactive peptide of the RAS, in the central nervous system and to regulate blood pressure and cardiovascular function. However, little is known about neuronal PRR function in overnutrition-related metabolic physiology. Here, we show that PRR deletion in neurons reduces blood pressure, neurogenic pressor activity, and fasting blood glucose and improves glucose tolerance without affecting food intake or body weight following a 16-wk HFD. Mechanistically, we found that a HFD increases levels of the PRR ligand (pro)renin in the circulation and hypothalamus and of ANG II in the hypothalamus, indicating activation of the brain RAS. Importantly, PRR deletion in neurons reduced astrogliosis and activation of the astrocytic NF-κB p65 (RelA) in the arcuate nucleus and the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus. Collectively, our findings indicate that the neuronal PRR plays essential roles in overnutrition-related metabolic pathophysiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Worker et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: