Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the short- and long-term repeatability (intraobserver variation) of the renal resistive index (RI) in a pig model. METHODS: Under standardized ambient conditions, short- and long-term repeatabilities were assessed by measuring the RI three consecutive times at 30-minute intervals in 14 pigs and twice 4 weeks apart in 6 pigs, respectively. Repeatability was judged according to predefined criteria, which included calculation of coefficients of variation (CVs) and repeatability coefficients combined with visual assessment and estimation of bias. RESULTS: Short-term repeatability was acceptable, having an average CV of 4.9% +/- 2.9% and of 6.1% +/- 4.7% in two comparisons, findings that were reiterated in the visual assessment. Long-term results were, however, less consistent, having an average CV of 8.1% +/- 6.1% and prominent scatter on the visual assessment graphs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, RI measurements showed an acceptable short-term repeatability, whereas long-term results were less consistent. The components of error contributing to the modest long-term repeatability need to be investigated in studies of larger populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rawashdeh et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: