Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate hemodynamic parameters in the ophthalmic artery using color Doppler imaging in patients with POAG, NTG, and age-matched normal subjects.
Are there differences in ophthalmic artery hemodynamic parameters between patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, and normal subjects?
Are there differences in ophthalmic artery hemodynamic parameters between patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma, and normal subjects?
Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal-tension glaucoma exhibit altered ophthalmic artery hemodynamics, characterized by lower flow velocities and higher resistance compared to normal subjects.
Purpose: To study the hemodynamic parameters in ophthalmic artery (OA) using color Doppler imaging in subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) and age matched normals. Methods: Sixty-eight eyes of 68 subjects (41 males and 27 females) constituted material for this prospective observational study. They were divided into three groups; Group A had 24 patients with POAG, Group B had 18 patients with NTG and Group C had 26 normal subjects. They underwent CDI of OA. The outcome variables were peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), resistivity index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI). Data were compiled and analyzed using one-way ANOVA analysis. Results: The mean SD age of POAG patients, NTG patient and normal subjects was 59.95 7.35, 58.11 9.97 and 57.73 5.39 years, respectively. The mean intra ocular pressure (IOP) was 29.8 5.0, 15.9 2.4 and 16.6 1.7mm Hg in Group A, B and C, respectively. In group A, the mean PSV, EDV, RI and PI were 18.2 3.80, 3.71 1.40, 0.93 0.12 and 2.8 0.42. In group B, 26.6 1.72, 4.93 1.32, 0.84 0.02 and 1.32 0.20 and in group C, 35.4 3.04, 0.69, 0.77 0.03 and 1.80 0.17, respectively. All the values were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). Lower PSV and EDV were found in POAG and NTG patients, while RI was higher than in normal subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tiwari et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: