Some studies have reported that proinflammatory polymorphisms in interleukin-1B (IL-1B) and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RN) genes are associated with increased gastric cancer risk. However, other studies have shown null or inverse associations. This meta-analysis reviews and summarizes published evidence for these associations. Searching the PubMed Database yielded 35 studies that reported on the association between IL-1B -511 C>T, IL-1B -31 T>C, or IL-1RN variable number tandem repeat polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk. Q-statistics and I(2) statistics were calculated to examine heterogeneity. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated in the random-effects model using the DerSimonian-Laird method. For all gastric cancers, the overall ORs (95% CIs) for IL-1B -511 CT versus CC and TT versus CC genotypes were 1.07 (0.91-1.25) and 1.16 (0.95-1.42), respectively. ORs (95% CIs) for the association between IL-1B -31 CT versus TT and CC versus TT genotypes were 0.99 (0.83-1.19) and 0.98 (0.78-1.21), respectively. For the associations between IL-1RN and gastric cancer, ORs (95% CIs) for *2/L versus LL and *2/*2 versus L/L were 1.15 (0.96-1.38) and 1.23 (0.79-1.92). For each of the examined associations, there was significant heterogeneity among studies; P(heterogeneity) < or = 0.001 and I(2) ranged from 0.54 to 0.71. Noncardia cancers showed stronger associations with IL-1B -511 CT or TT and IL1-RN *2/*2 genotypes, but limiting the analysis to intestinal-type cancers, studies conducted in Western countries, or studies in which polymorphisms were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, made no material difference in the results. The overall associations between IL-1B or IL-1RN proinflammatory polymorphisms and gastric cancer were null but several studies showed an association. The sources of this variation are unclear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kamangar et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: