Why the study?
Do weighted nasoenteric feeding tubes facilitate duodenal intubations compared to unweighted tubes in patients requiring enteral feeding?
Do weighted nasoenteric feeding tubes facilitate duodenal intubations compared to unweighted tubes in patients requiring enteral feeding?
Weighted nasoenteric feeding tubes offer no advantage over unweighted tubes in achieving successful duodenal intubations.
Weighted tubes confer no duodenal intubation advantage; confirms lack of benefit over unweighted tubes and supports their routine use in enteral feeding.
A widely held assumption is that postpyloric intubations occur more often with weighted than with unweighted nasally inserted feeding tubes. This randomized, prospective study compared the frequency of duodenal intubations using weighted and unweighted nasoenteric feeding tubes. One hundred sixteen patients had either weighted (61 patients) or unweighted (55 patients) 10F silicone elastomer feeding tubes inserted nasally 85 cm. Tubes were placed with wire stylets. Tube positions were verified radiographically within 4 hr after insertions. Radiographs were repeated daily for 3 days or until duodenal intubation occurred. Successful duodenal intubations were achieved in 35 patients (57%) with weighted feeding tubes and in 37 patients (67%) with unweighted feeding tubes. This difference was not significant. Weighted nasoenteric feeding tubes offer no advantage over unweighted tubes in achieving duodenal intubations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levenson et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: