Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 21, 2016Molecular Ecology Resources

Detection limits of quantitative and digital PCR assays and their influence in presence–absence surveys of environmental DNA

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MHMargaret E. HunterUnited States Geological SurveyRDRobert M. DorazioSenckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research CentreJBJohn S. ButterfieldUniversity of Florida

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Hunter et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a835fbbf341e548e9d9d458https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12619
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The application of <scp>eDNA</scp> for monitoring of the Great Crested Newt in the UK2014 · 116 citations
  2. 2Comparison of Droplet Digital PCR and Seminested Real-Time PCR for Quantification of Cell-Associated HIV-1 RNA2014 · 154 citations
  3. 3Critical considerations for the application of environmental <scp>DNA</scp> methods to detect aquatic species2016 · 1,054 citations
  4. 4Statistical approaches to account for false‐positive errors in environmental <scp>DNA</scp> samples2015 · 185 citations
  5. 5Highly Precise Measurement of HIV DNA by Droplet Digital PCR2013 · 522 citations