Why the study?
Does the indexed effective orifice area measured by Doppler echocardiography accurately assess the severity of subaortic stenosis in dogs?
Does the indexed effective orifice area measured by Doppler echocardiography accurately assess the severity of subaortic stenosis in dogs?
The indexed effective orifice area measured by Doppler echocardiography is a useful and feasible noninvasive parameter for assessing the severity of subaortic stenosis in dogs.
Indexed EOA may aid SAS severity grading in dogs; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
To evaluate the usefulness of the Doppler-derived effective orifice area (EOA) in assessing the hemodynamic severity of subaortic stenosis (SAS) in dogs, 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic examinations were performed in 16 dogs with SAS, 22 normal adult dogs, and 22 normal puppies. The EOA was calculated by the continuity equation using the stroke volume determined in the right ventricular outflow tract. The EOA was significantly lower (P < .001 ) in the SAS dogs (0.76+/-0.45 cm2) and in the normal puppies (1.58+/-1.00 cm2) than in the normal adult dogs (2.34+/-0.78 cm2). The EOA indexed for body surface area (IEOA) was significantly lower (0.89+/-0.48 cm2/m2) in SAS dogs than in the normal puppies (2.42+/-0.85 cm2/m2) or adults (2.22+/-0.76 cm2/m2). The normal dogs (adults and puppies) had an IEOA of > or =1.25 cm2/m2. Among the demographic and echocardiographic parameters measured in this study, only the indexed EOA was significantly associated (P = .03) with the occurrence of adverse events (eg, syncope, episodic weakness, ventricular arrhythmias). This study demonstrates the usefulness and feasibility of the indexed EOA as measured by Doppler echocardiography for noninvasive assessment of SAS severity in dogs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bélanger et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: